6. APPRENTICE LEARNING ASSESSMENT
Core 6.1.
SYSTEM DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ITEM 6.1.1
CompanyEducational Center andITEM 6.1.2 Educational Center and
Company
The educational center and the company haveThe educational center and the company have
actively established the system and criteria for the established and communicate to the students
summative assessment of learningthe evaluation systems and criteria as well as the
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothingchanges that occur
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothing
In the design of the Dual Professional Formative
programs, the training objectives are set at the
different levels and goals to be achieved are
established, which are supervised by means of
specific indicators. These indicators make it possible
to measure the success achieved in relation to
standards and the individual skills that must be
acquired. The interested parties must participate
and collaborate from the beginning in the definition
of these standards and in the setting of the
objectives to be achieved [1. European. See: EQAVET
P1, A4]. International quality assurance systems also
advise defining the criteria for evaluating learning
and using summative evaluation as a model, the
characteristics of which are developed in section 6.3
of this Guide [2. International. See: ISO 21001:2018
– Section 8.1.2.c]. In order to actively establish
the methodology and evaluation systems, the
participation of the company must be counted on,
thus meeting the needs of the sector. Regular and
systematic data collection is appropriate to measure
success. This will allow knowing the academic
performance and applying early warning systems.
This makes it possible to intervene in advance in
areas that need improvement [1. European. See:
EQAVET P1, A4].Within the European quality assurance systems,
it is advisable to design an information policy that
guarantees an adequate disclosure of the results
that are obtained throughout the development
of the Dual Professional Formative programs,
always subject to data protection requirements
[1 . European. See: EQAVET P1]. The international
quality assurance systems advise communicating
the instruments and criteria to the students and,
where appropriate, checking their understanding
[2. International. See: ISO 21001:2018 – Section
8.2.2.a]. In the quality assurance system, processes
are periodically evaluated and action plans are
drawn up to introduce changes. Systems adjust
accordingly. It must be taken into account that the
changes in the evaluation systems and criteria must
be explicit and transparent, keeping the interested
parties duly informed through a wide dissemination.
[one. European. See: EQAVET R1].