characteristics, combine self-assessment and
external control. For this, the educational center
and the company must develop an evaluation
methodology that includes internal and external
evaluation.
This includes periodic self-assessment in accordance
with European and international regulations,
national and regional frameworks or at the initiativeITEM 6.2.4 Educational center and
of the training institutions themselves, includingCompany
The educational center and the company apply a the company. With this, the educational center is
periodic evaluation system (internal and external) able to obtain basic information on the educational
that includes self-assessments and external control achievements or the qualifications achieved by
the students, as well as the quality of the trainingof student results
processes. Qualification is understood as the “formalCompletely / Enough / Something / Nothing
result of an evaluation and validation process that is
obtained when a competent body establishes that
The recommendations of the European Parliament an individual’s learning has exceeded a certain level”
on the quality of the certification of learning [1. European. See: EQAVET A4; Recommendation
outcomes establish that the systems must use OJ C 111 of 6.5.2008 ].
coherent evaluation methods that, among otherplagiarism and other bad practices are established
and communicated to students. [two. International.
See: ISO 21001:2018 – Section 8.5.1.4 a)].
Core 6.3.
Recognition of learning. Qualifications
(Summative evaluation)
ITEM 6.3.1 Educational center and
Companyand the grade. All of this should be issued as docu-
mented information. Students should have full ac-
cess to their work and its detailed assessment and
be offered opportunities for feedback [2. Internatio-
nal. See: ISO 21001:2018 – Section 8.5.1.5 a) c) d)].
The European quality assurance systems indicate
that the information about the results of the eva-
luations must be communicated to the interested
parties. To collect feedback, procedures, mecha-
nisms, as well as instruments to carry out reviews
must be established at all levels. All this contributes
to raising the degree of transparency of the quality
of training [1. European. See: EQAVET R1, R4]. Inter-
national quality assurance systems advise that orga-
nizations should ensure that students are informed
of the results of the summative assessment activityITEM 6.3.2 Educational center and
CompanyStudents have full access to their work and its de-
tailed evaluation, issuing it as documented informa-
tion and establishing feedback processes
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothing
The educational center and the company guaran-
tee the traceability of the grades (what, when and
by whom) so that an objective connection can be
identified between the student’s work presented
and the assigned grade
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothing
European quality assurance systems advise that