7. LABOR INSERTION OF THE APPRENTICE
Core 7.1.
Processes for measurement and assessment of
performance in the workplace
ITEM 7.1.1
CompanyEducational center and
The educational center and the company determine
the process of monitoring, measurement, analysis
and evaluation of the apprentice’s performance
in the workplace after the completion of the Dual
Professional Formative programs
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothing
European quality systems advise the participation of
interested parties in the process of monitoring and
evaluating performance. It must be based on an
adequate and clearly described methodology. The
objective pursued is to collect basic information on
the educational achievements in the performance
of the apprentice in the workplace. It also indicates
that regular and systematic data collection is
appropriate to measure success and identify areas
for improvement. In the evaluation and review of
the processes and results, the assessment of the
satisfaction of the people who participate in the
learning tasks and the performance and satisfaction
of the staff can be included. These processes can
include adequate and effective mechanisms to
involve internal and external stakeholders. With this
performance measurement, the aim is to improve
the results of the people who participate in the
learning processes in order to improve the response
capacity of the Dual Professional Formative
programs to the labor market. This measurement
process aims in turn to foster a culture of quality
improvement in Dual Professional Formative
programs among providers and improve mutual
trust in the provision of training. It is advisable
to collect feedback from people participating in
training programs about their individual learning
experience. Also about the environment in which
teaching takes place. Next to them, it is indicated
that it is possible to incorporate the impressions of
the teachers. This information is used to inspire new
initiatives. For operational purposes, procedures,
mechanisms and instruments are defined to carryout reviews at all levels, which is
appropriate and necessary to include the effective
performance of what is learned in the real job.
[one. European. See: EQAVET A1, A3, A4, R2]. ].
International quality assurance systems advise
that the organization should determine what
needs monitoring and measurement. At the
same time, it is timely to determine the precise
methods to be used in the analysis and evaluation
to ensure valid results. It is also opportune to
establish the acceptance criteria that will be used;
when monitoring and measurement should be
performed and when the results of monitoring and
measurement should be analyzed and evaluated.
The organization must keep the appropriate
documented information as evidence of monitoring,
measurement, analysis, evaluation and its results.
The organization must evaluate the performance of
the educational organization and the effectiveness
of the SGOE. People should have the opportunity
to critically review their own work in a thoughtful
and constructive way, as a contribution to its
improvement [2. International. See: ISO 21001:2018
– Section 9.1.1].
ITEM 7.1.2
CompanyEducational center and
The educational center and the company establish
clear objectives and the methods to measure and
evaluate the performance in the workplace of those
who complete the Dual Professional Formative
programs
Completely / Enough / Something / Nothing
The European quality assurance systems recommend
establishing clear objectives, actions and specific
indicators that allow the level of performance in
the job to be measured. These should be subject
to a stakeholder consultation process to identify
specific local or individual needs. The results must
be periodically evaluated through measurements